Are these misconceptions about rust?

Hey all, I am planning to write a small 2D game engine (not to be used professionally, haha) and I am evaluating 2 languages for the core engine, rust and zig. I have heard the following points about rust and reasons not to use it for game/engine development, and I am wondering if these points are true or false:

​

1. Anything other than a ECS architecture for your engine in rust will be hard to implement with the borrow checker, and it will require lots of unsafe code.
2. Getting rust to work on platforms without an LLVM backend is hard and could require porting the entire toolchain if the project doesn't use no\_std, whereas zig is easily portable to any platform with libc or musl (?).
3. Compile times for rust are long (I mean I believe this to be pretty true)
4. C interop in rust requires manually writing bindings or using bindgen, where as you can just pull a C lib and use it without much effort in zig.

I don't know much about rust, I have just heard this from around communities and am wondering if any of these reasons not to use rust for engine dev are valid.

​

Thanks all!