Built a desktop app with Tauri 2.0 - impressions after 6 months

356 points CodeWithInferno 46 comments

Used Tauri to build Lokus, a note-taking app. Thought I'd share my experience since Tauri 2.0 is still relatively new.

Background:
Previously built desktop apps with Electron. Hated the bloat. Tried Tauri for this project.

The Good:

  • Bundle size: 10MB vs 100MB+ with Electron
  • Memory usage: ~50MB vs ~200MB
  • Startup time: sub-1 second consistently
  • Native feel on each platform
  • Rust backend = actual performance for heavy operations (search, graph layout)
  • Hot reload works great

The Challenging:

  • Debugging Rust<->JS bridge can be painful
  • Smaller ecosystem than Electron
  • Some platform-specific quirks (especially Linux)
  • IPC serialization needs careful planning
  • Documentation is good but not as extensive as Electron

Performance wins:

  • Full-text search across 10k files: ~50ms (would be 500ms+ in pure JS)
  • Graph layout calculations in Web Worker + Rust: 60fps with 1000+ nodes
  • File operations are instant (no Node.js overhead)

Architecture:

React Frontend <-> Tauri IPC <-> Rust Backend
                                   ├─ File System
                                   ├─ Search Engine
                                   ├─ Plugin Manager
                                   └─ MCP Server

Would I use Tauri again?
Absolutely. The performance gains are worth the learning curve. Especially for apps that do heavy computation.

Caveats:

  • If your app is simple CRUD, Electron might be easier
  • If you need extensive native integrations, Tauri 2.0 shines
  • If bundle size matters, Tauri is a no-brainer

Code is open source if you want to see a real-world example: https://github.com/lokus-ai/lokus

Happy to answer questions about the Rust/Tauri experience!