Built a desktop app with Tauri 2.0 - impressions after 6 months
Used Tauri to build Lokus, a note-taking app. Thought I'd share my experience since Tauri 2.0 is still relatively new.
Background:
Previously built desktop apps with Electron. Hated the bloat. Tried Tauri for this project.
The Good:
- Bundle size: 10MB vs 100MB+ with Electron
- Memory usage: ~50MB vs ~200MB
- Startup time: sub-1 second consistently
- Native feel on each platform
- Rust backend = actual performance for heavy operations (search, graph layout)
- Hot reload works great
The Challenging:
- Debugging Rust<->JS bridge can be painful
- Smaller ecosystem than Electron
- Some platform-specific quirks (especially Linux)
- IPC serialization needs careful planning
- Documentation is good but not as extensive as Electron
Performance wins:
- Full-text search across 10k files: ~50ms (would be 500ms+ in pure JS)
- Graph layout calculations in Web Worker + Rust: 60fps with 1000+ nodes
- File operations are instant (no Node.js overhead)
Architecture:
React Frontend <-> Tauri IPC <-> Rust Backend
├─ File System
├─ Search Engine
├─ Plugin Manager
└─ MCP Server
Would I use Tauri again?
Absolutely. The performance gains are worth the learning curve. Especially for apps that do heavy computation.
Caveats:
- If your app is simple CRUD, Electron might be easier
- If you need extensive native integrations, Tauri 2.0 shines
- If bundle size matters, Tauri is a no-brainer
Code is open source if you want to see a real-world example: https://github.com/lokus-ai/lokus
Happy to answer questions about the Rust/Tauri experience!